On June 3, 2025, during a demonstration for the release of Israeli hostages in the city of Boulder, Colorado, a Muslim burned people of Jewish origin with flamethrowers and homemade Molotov cocktails. Several injuries were reported, at least 12, including 8 aged between 67 and 88.
And here’s a clip of the terrorist:
Some data on the terrorist.
Name: Muhammad Sabry Soliman. Origin: Egypt. Age: 45.
In the cover image of his Facebook account the stupidest book in the world: the sublime Quran.
Among the contents that “Mohammed the Egyptian” has openly enjoyed are the concept of martyrdom, the Muslim Brotherhood, and various pages that have been praising Hamas terrorists for about 10 years (in other words, the platform has been leaving these accounts undisturbed for 10 years, regardless of the fact that some of them might burn Jews alive in the future, any day in Colorado…).
This horrifying anti-Semitic attack fits directly into the list of terrorist attacks that we could call “Globalize Intifada”, the slogan that has been shouted for more than 2 years all over the world and that translates as “we liked October 7th so much that we want more and we want it everywhere”.
The phenomenon of Globalize Intifada is an expansion of Islamic ideology with very worrying worsenings, namely the active participation of non-Muslim people and the lack of understanding of the word “Palestine”.
“Palestine” is a code that Islam invented to kill Jews, a priority precept in Islamic ideology because the success or victory of Islam depends on the death of Jews (I invite you to listen to this conference to learn more about the aforementioned bond of interdependence that I speak specifically about from minute 20).
“Free Palestine” means killing the Jews and I feel I can superimpose this slogan to Allah akbar, the cry that typically accompanies the killing of infidels by Islamic terrorists. But if Allah akbar was an exclusive code of Islam, with the exportation of Islamic anti-Semitism the use of the code was globalized in non-Islamic environments so that non-Muslims could also universalize the fight (jihad) aimed at the extermination of the Jewish people.
We have proof of this horrifying mechanism in the attack that took place in Washington in which Elias Rodriguez, a non-Muslim but pro-Palestinian terrorist assassin, killed two people and of which I spoke here.
Another proof of the universalization of the code is the slogan already mentioned “globalize intifada” which means repeating in the world what happened in the typical Middle Eastern intifadas in which Jews were joyfully killed on trams, in bars, in pizzerias and, why not, lynched alive with the export of their organs then held in hand as trophies (yes, it really happened: the Islamic-Satanist euphoria of the corpses used as trophies on October 7 is the scenographic amplification of the Ramallah lynching of the year 2000).
I know Islam well enough to be able to say that not even Islam itself could hope for such a wide success of its own wishes for Jewish death: the pro-Palestinians are jihadists without being Muslims. There was no need to convert them, train them, pay them or indoctrinate them.
In the past there was a long phase in which Islam attempted to replace some terms so that terrorism would be mystified and perceived as non-terrorism (Zionist for Jew, occupied lands for dawa, intifada for jihad) but today that phase has ended, archived forever. In 2025 the “Palestine” code supports anti-Semitic Islamic terrorism and does not even hide it: it writes it on its placards displayed in the square in front of everyone, as happened yesterday in Rome at the demonstration for Gaza.
In the capital of the Bel Paese, the homeland of fascism without which the Nazism of the Third Reich would not have been born, Hamas terrorism is understandable and consequent.
Not even Islam hoped for such a great success.
And to the people who wrote the “understandable and consequent”, to those who marched near that sign, to all those present who did not dissociate themselves, I wish you this:
